VASQUEZ, BENANCIO, PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2016·No. KA 12-02357·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

23 KA 12-02357 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BENANCIO VASQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered March 23, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.80 [1] [b]). Defendant was sentenced to a determinate term of incarceration of five years to be followed by 10 years of postrelease supervision. The valid waiver by defendant of his right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). In any event, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 25, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VASQUEZ, BENANCIO, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

VASQUEZ, BENANCIO, PEOPLE v (VASQUEZ, BENANCIO, PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)