Vaso Boreta v. Edward J. Kirby, Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California
This text of 485 F.2d 582 (Vaso Boreta v. Edward J. Kirby, Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The order of dismissal of this civil rights action, D.C., 328 F.Supp. 670, is affirmed. We hold that the waiver signed by Boreta in connection with his company's application for a liquor license authorized that which is complained of here now.
Authorizations, such as that executed by the plaintiff, are not valid indefinitely. A practice of requiring regular and not too infrequent authorizations would serve to reduce the significance of the constitutional issues with which the court below was concerned. No opinion is here expressed regarding the immunity of any of the defendants had the examination of the bank accounts in this case been unauthorized.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 F.2d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaso-boreta-v-edward-j-kirby-director-of-the-department-of-alcoholic-ca9-1973.