Vasilinda v. Lozano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vasilinda v. Lozano

622 So. 2d 4, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5248, 1993 WL 152516

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1993

DocketNo. 93-979

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 4 (Vasilinda v. Lozano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vasilinda v. Lozano, 622 So. 2d 4, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5248, 1993 WL 152516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(d), a member of the media challenges an order of the trial court restricting televising the voir dire examination and the sitting jurors in State v. Loza-no. Because the case has been transferred to the Ninth Circuit, where the trial will take place, and the trial judge has been assigned by the Supreme Court as a judge of that circuit “to dispose of all matters considered by him in said case,” we conclude that this proceeding must be transferred to the Fifth District Court of Appeal, which has appellate jurisdiction over Ninth Circuit cases. Raymond, James & Assocs. v. Wieneke, 479 So.2d 752 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), is not at all contrary to this conclusion because it did not involve an assignment of the trial judge to the transferee circuit.

Cause transferred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(d), a member of the media challenges an order of the trial court restricting televising the voir dire examination and the sitting jurors in State v. Loza-no. Because the case has been transferred to the Ninth Circuit, where the trial will take place, and the trial judge has been assigned by the Supreme Court as a judge of that circuit “to dispose of all matters considered by him in said case,” we conclude that this proceeding must be transferred to the Fifth District Court of Appeal, which has appellate jurisdiction over Ninth Circuit cases. Raymond, James & Assocs. v. Wieneke, 479 So.2d 752 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), is not at all contrary to this conclusion because it did not involve an assignment of the trial judge to the transferee circuit.

Cause transferred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 4, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5248, 1993 WL 152516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasilinda-v-lozano-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack