Vasel v. Adamec

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vasel v. Adamec

497 S.W.3d 291, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 571, 2016 WL 3180201

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 7, 2016

DocketED 103374

StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.3d 291 (Vasel v. Adamec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vasel v. Adamec, 497 S.W.3d 291, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 571, 2016 WL 3180201 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Vasel appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondents Annette Adamec and Allstate Insurance Go. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and contains no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Vasel appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondents Annette Adamec and Allstate Insurance Go. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and contains no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.3d 291, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 571, 2016 WL 3180201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasel-v-adamec-moctapp-2016.