Vasel v. Adamec

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vasel v. Adamec

497 S.W.3d 291, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 571, 2016 WL 3180201

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2016·No. ED 103374·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Vasel appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondents Annette Adamec and Allstate Insurance Go. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and contains no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Vasel appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondents Annette Adamec and Allstate Insurance Go. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and contains no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2016).

Vasel v. Adamec, 497 S.W.3d 291, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 571, 2016 WL 3180201 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 291 (Vasel v. Adamec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.