Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Inc.

322 F. App'x 311
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2009
DocketNo. 08-1780
StatusPublished

This text of 322 F. App'x 311 (Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Inc., 322 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quintín T. Vasciannie appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) claim and his 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. June 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F. App'x 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasciannie-v-tidewater-skanska-inc-ca4-2009.