Varvitsiotes v. Pierre
This text of 260 A.D.2d 297 (Varvitsiotes v. Pierre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered December 16, 1997, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer pursuant to CPLR 3126, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Uncontested evidence of discovery noncompliance by defendant, including his repeated and unexplained failures to attend court ordered depositions, warranted the striking of his answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 (see, Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488, Iv denied 88 NY2d 802). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D.2d 297, 689 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varvitsiotes-v-pierre-nyappdiv-1999.