Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAFIK VARTANPOUR, No. 80487 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
FILED
FEB
A. BROWN
CLE F•REME COURT BY
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for an order directing the district court clerk to issue a presentence investigation report to appellant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
MA.V4.4 kale:64V3 , J.
Stiglich Silver
to-V(0113
cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Rafik Vartanpour Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SupRem Com Of NEVADA
(0) 1947A data 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State (Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.