Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State
This text of Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State (Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RAFIK VARTANPOUR, No. 80487 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED FEB A. BROWN CLE F•REME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for an order directing the district court clerk to issue a presentence investigation report to appellant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
MA.V4.4 kale:64V3 , J. Stiglich Silver
to-V(0113 cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Rafik Vartanpour Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SupRem Com Of NEVADA
(0) 1947A data 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vartanpour-rafik-vs-state-nev-2020.