Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 20, 2020·No. 80487·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RAFIK VARTANPOUR, No. 80487 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED

FEB

A. BROWN

CLE F•REME COURT BY

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for an order directing the district court clerk to issue a presentence investigation report to appellant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

MA.V4.4 kale:64V3 , J.

Stiglich Silver

to-V(0113

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Rafik Vartanpour Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SupRem Com Of NEVADA

(0) 1947A data 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State (Vartanpour (Rafik) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)