Vartanian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Vartanian v. State

90 S.W.2d 835

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 5, 1936

DocketNo. 17885

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.W.2d 835 (Vartanian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vartanian v. State, 90 S.W.2d 835 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his penalty was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for not less than five nor more than twelve years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. Nothing in the record is perceived which would warrant a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his penalty was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for not less than five nor more than twelve years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought up for review. Nothing in the record is perceived which would warrant a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.W.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vartanian-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.