Varrichio v. Chicago Insurance

Second Circuit

Varrichio v. Chicago Insurance

328 F.3d 50

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 2003

DocketDocket No. 02-7002

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.3d 50 (Varrichio v. Chicago Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Varrichio v. Chicago Insurance, 328 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On November 14, 2002, this court certified the following question to the New York Court of Appeals:

Where an insured has already complied with a policy’s notice of claim requirement, does New York require the insurer to demonstrate prejudice in order to disclaim coverage based on the insured’s failure to comply with the policy’s notice of suit requirement? '

Varrichio v. Chicago Ins. Co., 312 F.3d 544 (2d Cir.2002). The New York Court of Appeals accepted the certified question on December 12, 2002. The parties subsequently notified this court that they had entered into a settlement agreement that is conditional on the dismissal of this appeal and have requested that we dismiss the appeal. The New York Court of Appeals has informed us that, under the circumstances, it has no objection to the appeal being dismissed and has asked us to withdraw the certification. Accordingly we Withdraw the certification to the New York Court of Appeals and Dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On November 14, 2002, this court certified the following question to the New York Court of Appeals:

Where an insured has already complied with a policy’s notice of claim requirement, does New York require the insurer to demonstrate prejudice in order to disclaim coverage based on the insured’s failure to comply with the policy’s notice of suit requirement? '

Varrichio v. Chicago Ins. Co., 312 F.3d 544 (2d Cir.2002). The New York Court of Appeals accepted the certified question on December 12, 2002. The parties subsequently notified this court that they had entered into a settlement agreement that is conditional on the dismissal of this appeal and have requested that we dismiss the appeal. The New York Court of Appeals has informed us that, under the circumstances, it has no objection to the appeal being dismissed and has asked us to withdraw the certification. Accordingly we Withdraw the certification to the New York Court of Appeals and Dismiss the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.3d 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varrichio-v-chicago-insurance-ca2-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack