Varnum v. Mauro
28 F. Cas. 1099, 2 Cranch 425
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1823
StatusPublished
This text of 28 F. Cas. 1099 (Varnum v. Mauro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Varnum v. Mauro, 28 F. Cas. 1099, 2 Cranch 425 (circtddc 1823).
Opinion
To the admission of this evidence the plaintiff objected, and THE COURT (nem. con.) sustained the objection; being of opinion that the facts, if proved, would be no defence in this action.
The defendant took a bill of exceptions, but did not prosecute a writ of error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 1099, 2 Cranch 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varnum-v-mauro-circtddc-1823.