Varnum v. Barrett
161 A.D. 930
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 161 A.D. 930 (Varnum v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Varnum v. Barrett, 161 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented on Canfield v. N. Y. Transportation Co. (128 App. Div. 450).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Canfield v. New York Transportation Co.
128 A.D. 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 A.D. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varnum-v-barrett-nyappdiv-1914.