Varner v. Swatara Township Board of Commissioners

170 A.3d 1040
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 11, 2017·No. 202 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law in concluding that the First Class Township Code required Swatara Township to seek judicial approval of its by-ward reapportionment effort despite the applicability of the Municipal Reapportionment Act and Article IX, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the legislative authority afforded to Pennsylvania municipalities to conduct reapportionment[?]
*1041 2. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law by interpreting the phrase “not entirely elected at large” contained in the Pennsylvania Constitution and Municipal Reapportionment Act in a manner violating the rules of statutory construction!;?]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Varner v. Swatara Township Board of Commissioners, 170 A.3d 1040 (Pa. 2017).

170 A.3d 1040 (Varner v. Swatara Township Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Varner, J. v. Swatara Township, Aplt.
185 A.3d 295 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)