Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Pa. Super. 14
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 2015·No. 261 WDA 2014·Published

Opinion

J. A29033/14

2015 PA Super 14

DONNA VARNER-MORT AND : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DANIEL MORT, H/W, : PENNSYLVANIA : Appellants : : v. : : BRIDGET KAPFHAMMER : No. 261 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order, January 24, 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County Civil Division at No. 2011 GN 2170

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., ALLEN AND STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED JANUARY 21, 2015

I concur in the result reached by the Majority because I disagree with

the suggestion that the holding in Walls v. Scheckler, 700 A.2d 532

(Pa.Super. 1997), was “just plain wrong.” To the contrary, I believe a

unanimous panel of this court correctly decided Walls, and allowance of

appeal was denied by our Supreme Court in 1998. My research has

disclosed no other appellate decision which calls into question its holding.1

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. 1 Walls was distinguished in Haines v. Jones, 830 A.2d 579 (Pa.Super. 2003), based on the facts unique to the Haines case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B., (Pa. Ct. App. 2015).

Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B. (Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haines v. Jones
830 A.2d 579 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.
109 A.3d 244 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Walls v. Scheckler
700 A.2d 532 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)