Varnakov v. Malikhin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Varnakov v. Malikhin

266 A.D.2d 534, 698 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 534 (Varnakov v. Malikhin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Varnakov v. Malikhin, 266 A.D.2d 534, 698 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to determine title to real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated March 30, 1999, as denied his motion to consolidate the instant action with a summary eviction proceeding commenced against him in the Justice Court of the Town of Clarkstown entitled Matter of Rockland Consulting & Mgt. Corp. v Varnakov.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to consolidate this action with a summary eviction proceeding commenced against him in the Justice Court of the Town of Clarkstown by the defendant Rockland Consulting and Management Corp. (see, CPLR 602 [b]; Stein v Waldbaum’s Supermarket, 222 AD2d 575; Cohen v Goldfein, 100 AD2d 795). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Gold-stein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to determine title to real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated March 30, 1999, as denied his motion to consolidate the instant action with a summary eviction proceeding commenced against him in the Justice Court of the Town of Clarkstown entitled Matter of Rockland Consulting & Mgt. Corp. v Varnakov.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to consolidate this action with a summary eviction proceeding commenced against him in the Justice Court of the Town of Clarkstown by the defendant Rockland Consulting and Management Corp. (see, CPLR 602 [b]; Stein v Waldbaum’s Supermarket, 222 AD2d 575; Cohen v Goldfein, 100 AD2d 795). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Gold-stein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 534, 698 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varnakov-v-malikhin-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack