Varnado v. Rakusin Law Firm

88 So. 3d 428, 2012 WL 1698285, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2012·No. No. 4D11-2956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for second-tier review of the order of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity is granted. The court dismissed petitioner’s appeal of a county court judgment for failure to file a brief, without providing ten days’ notice as required before sanctions may be imposed. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.410. Respondent concedes that the court departed from the essential requirements of law. See Tucker v. Charles D. Franken, P.A., 62 So.3d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). See also United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Total Rehab & Med. Ctr., 870 So.2d 866, 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). This matter is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing cases.

WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Varnado v. Rakusin Law Firm, 88 So. 3d 428, 2012 WL 1698285, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7847 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 428 (Varnado v. Rakusin Law Firm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

UNITED AUTO. INS. v. Total Rehab & Medical Center
870 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Tucker v. Charles D. Franken, P.A.
62 So. 3d 1207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)