Varn v. Breen
This text of 97 S.E. 106 (Varn v. Breen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There is no merit in the assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court. The charge of the court has been carefully examined, and, when considered as a whole, it was full and fair, and presented the issues of the case.
2. The evidence was conflicting, but was sufficient to authorize the Verdict, which has the approval of the! trial judge. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial are sufficient to require a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.E. 106, 22 Ga. App. 694, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varn-v-breen-gactapp-1918.