Various Tenants of 123 Guernsey Street v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Various Tenants of 123 Guernsey Street v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 503 (Various Tenants of 123 Guernsey Street v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Various Tenants of 123 Guernsey Street v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated December 9, 2002, which denied a petition for administrative review and confirmed an order of the Rent Administrator, dated May 14, 2002, finding that the subject building was exempt from rent regulation, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated October 28, 2003, which, in effect, [504]*504confirmed the determination, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly, in effect, confirmed the determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding, as the determination had a rational basis, and was not arbitrary or capricious (see Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 [L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended] § 5 [a] [5] [McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8625 (a) (5)]; Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2520.11 [e]; Matter of Steffey v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 276 AD2d 407, 408 [2000]). H. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated December 9, 2002, which denied a petition for administrative review and confirmed an order of the Rent Administrator, dated May 14, 2002, finding that the subject building was exempt from rent regulation, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated October 28, 2003, which, in effect, [504]*504confirmed the determination, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly, in effect, confirmed the determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding, as the determination had a rational basis, and was not arbitrary or capricious (see Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 [L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended] § 5 [a] [5] [McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8625 (a) (5)]; Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2520.11 [e]; Matter of Steffey v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 276 AD2d 407, 408 [2000]). H. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 503, 796 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/various-tenants-of-123-guernsey-street-v-new-york-state-division-of-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack