Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. SALEM LOGISTICS TRAFFIC SERVICES, LLC

717 S.E.2d 371, 2011 WL 3768400
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 25, 2011
Docket269PA11
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 717 S.E.2d 371 (Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. SALEM LOGISTICS TRAFFIC SERVICES, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. SALEM LOGISTICS TRAFFIC SERVICES, LLC, 717 S.E.2d 371, 2011 WL 3768400 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

717 S.E.2d 371 (2011)

VARIETY WHOLESALERS, INC.
v.
SALEM LOGISTICS TRAFFIC SERVICES, LLC, Salem Logistics, Inc., Salem Logistics Transport Services, LLC, Winston Transportation Management, LLC, Overbrook Leasing, LLC, Salem Logistics Transport Finance, LLC, David F. Eshelman, and Ark Royal Capital, LLC.

No. 269PA11.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2011.

Alexander Elkan, Greensboro, for Ark Royal Capital, LLC.

K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Variety Wholesalers, Inc.

Ellis B. Drew, III, Winston-Salem, for Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 1st of July 2011 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of July 2011 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate *372 Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brown
717 S.E.2d 371 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 S.E.2d 371, 2011 WL 3768400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/variety-wholesalers-inc-v-salem-logistics-traffic-services-llc-nc-2011.