Varick v. Bodine

3 Hill & Den. 444
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Hill & Den. 444 (Varick v. Bodine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Varick v. Bodine, 3 Hill & Den. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, J.

It is settled that the defendant may plead in bar that the plaintiff is not executor. (Thomas. v. Cameron, 16 Wend. 579.) After a regular demand of oyer the declaration is not complete until the oyer has been furnished. The demand was made before the time for pleading had expired, and the default was therefore irregular.

[445]*445Although costs are not in general allowed against an executor or administrator, there is no reason why he should not pay costs where his proceedings are set aside for irregularity. It has been held that an executor plaintiff must pay costs on a judgment of non pros. (Rudd v. Long, 4 John. R. 190.) So on a judgment as in case of nonsuit; (Brown v. Lambert, 16 John. R. 148 ;) and for a default in not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice without a sufficient excuse. (How v. Taylor, 1 Wend. 34.) The motion.must be granted with costs.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. How
1 Wend. 34 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)
Thomas v. Cameron
16 Wend. 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Hill & Den. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varick-v-bodine-nysupct-1842.