Variable Condenser Corp. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 539
United States Customs Court·Decided October 27, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9826; Entry Nos. 828806, etc.·Published

Opinion

LawRence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

Tbe submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Variable Condenser Corp. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 539 (cusc 1960).

45 Cust. Ct. 539 (Variable Condenser Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.