Vargo v. City of St. Louis

456 S.W.3d 99, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 167, 2015 WL 853043
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2015·No. No. ED 100899·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Magdalena Vargo (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court judgment in favor of the City of St. Louis (City) on her claim that the City discriminated against her on' the basis of her age in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act when it terminated her employment. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in excluding statistical evidence relating to the ages of all employees laid off by the City in the two years preceding her termination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vargo v. City of St. Louis, 456 S.W.3d 99, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 167, 2015 WL 853043 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

456 S.W.3d 99 (Vargo v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.