Vargas v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Vargas v. State

42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 168, 1990 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedMay 22, 1990

DocketNos. 84-CC-3559, 85-CC-0380 cons.

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 168 (Vargas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vargas v. State, 42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 168, 1990 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Burke, J.

This cause coming to be heard upon Claimant Cecil Calvert Odom’s request for hearing in review of the judgment entered December 19, 1988, the Court being fully advised in the premises finds:

1. That on December 21, 1988, a letter from Chloanne Greathouse, deputy clerk, and a check in the amount of $300 was sent to Cecil Calvert Odom and Louis E. Neuendorf & Associates;

2. That on January 23,1989, Claimant Cecil Calvert Odom filed with the Court of Claims a letter requesting a hearing and a review of the judgment entered;

3. That section 790.220 of the rules of the Court of Claims (74 Ill. Adm. Code 790.220) states:

“A party desiring a rehearing in any case shall, within 30 days after the filing of the opinion, file with the Clerk 6 copies of his petition for rehearing. The petition shall state briefly the points supposed to have been overlooked or misapprehended by the Court, with authorities and suggestions concisely stated in support of the points.”

4. That Claimant failed to comply with said rule.

It is therefore ordered:

Claimant’s request is denied and the judgment entered on December 19,1988, remains in full force and effect; a draft in the amount of $300 shall be reissued, said amount being in full and complete satisfaction of Claimant’s complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI