Vargas v. State
109 So. 3d 342, 2013 WL 1222794, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899
Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion for rehearing, we find the facts of this case distinguishable from those in Herring v. State, 501 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and Menna v. State, 846 So.2d 502 (Fla.2003). Accordingly, the appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vargas v. State, 109 So. 3d 342, 2013 WL 1222794, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
109 So. 3d 342 (Vargas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herring v. State
501 So. 2d 19 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Menna v. State
846 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)