Vargas v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO LUPITA VARGAS, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 23-00551 KG/LF MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 29), HEREBY ORDERS that attorney fees be, and hereby are, awarded under the EAJA, payable to Plaintiff but mailed to Plaintiffs attorney in the amount of $9,000.00 in attorney fees. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) CEAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiffs counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575 (10th Cir. 1986).
3nQe4L1— UNITED STATES DISTRIC DGE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY: Filed Electronically 11/20/2024 Laura J. Johnson Attorney for Plaintiff Armstrong Johnson Law, LLC Electronically Approved 11/20/2024 Victoria Johnson Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of Program Litigation - 6 Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vargas v. Social Security Administration (Vargas v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.