Vargas v. Fischer
This text of 121 A.D.3d 1138 (Vargas v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making threats and engaging in violent conduct. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony of a correction officer who heard petitioner make threatening comments after undergoing a pat frisk constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Evans v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1329, 1330 [2014]; Matter of Connelly v Griffin, 101 AD3d 1211, 1212 [2012]). Petitioner denied that he made any threats, but this contrary testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see id,.). Petitioner’s remaining arguments, to the extent they are properly before us, have been considered and found to lack merit.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 A.D.3d 1138, 992 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vargas-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2014.