Vargas v. Barclays Bank Delaware

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: January 21, 2025
• Docket: 1:24-cv-06549
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

GRANTED In part as tO FiaIntiits account numbers ana identity inrormation, and otnerwise □□□□□□ prejudice to renew. The party's confidentiality designation and the terms of the protective order are n of whether the public's rights of access to judicial documents overcomes competing considerations. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). By January 24, 2025, the parties confer and either (1) file the letter with Plaintiff's account numbers and identity information redacted, or { any renewed motion to seal the document that Plaintiff seeks to maintain under seal, alongside unredacted of the document with proposed redacted portions highlighted. Plaintiff shall support each request to or maintain information under seal with the basis for the request. The Clerk of Court is respectfully to close the motion at Dkt. 41 and keep Dkt. 42 under seal pending a possible renewed motion to seal. January 24, 2025, the parties shall also meet and confer about the issue identified in the letter at Dkt. 42, an a letter updating the Court on the negotiation progress. Plaintiff shall explain in the letter how the Complai Dkt. 1 complies with Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defende F.3d 185, 188-90 (2d Cir. 2008). The deadlines at Dkt. 39 are VACATED. January 21, 2025 New York, New York |

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL Re: Vargas v. Barclays Bank Delaware UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 1:24-cv-06549-LGS Letter Motion Seal Letter Dear Judge Schofield: We represent Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (“Barclays”) in the above-captioned matter and move pursuant to Individual Civil Rule I.D.3 to seal the letter Barclays filed today. Barclays filed the letter under seal because virtually all of it refers to information from Plaintiffs production (which is attached to the letter) that Plaintiff designated as confidential pursuant to the Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement, see ECF No. 37. We thank the Court for its continued attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Christina Prusak Chianese Amy P. Lally (admitted pro hac vice) Christina Prusak Chianese SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor 787 Seventh Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90067 New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (310) 595-9500 Telephone: (212) 839-5300 Facsimile: (310) 595-9501 Facsimile: (212) 839-5599 Email: alally@sidley.com Email: echianese@sidley.com

Tan M. Ross (admitted pro hac vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Sidley Austin (NY) LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership doing business as Sidley Austin LLP and practicing in affiliation with other Sidley Austin partnerships.

Page 2 1001 Brickell Bay Drive Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 391-5100 Facsimile: (305) 391-5101 Email: iross@sidley.com

Counsel for Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware ce: All counsel of record (via ECF)

Appendix Pursuant to Individual Civil Rule LD.3 Plaintiff and all counsel representing Plaintiff should have access to the letter filed under seal.