Vargas-Plancarte v. Holder
This text of 358 F. App'x 897 (Vargas-Plancarte v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Victor Manuel Vargas-Planearte, a na *898 tive and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vargas-Plancarte’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of law or fact in the BIA’s December 8, 2006, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
Vargas-Plancarte’s remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *898 ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 F. App'x 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vargas-plancarte-v-holder-ca9-2009.