Varela v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A.

712 So. 2d 832, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101, 1998 WL 375425
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1998
DocketNo. 97-3282
StatusPublished

This text of 712 So. 2d 832 (Varela v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Varela v. Gregory A. Martin & Associates, P.A., 712 So. 2d 832, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101, 1998 WL 375425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment after default. Because the wording of the summons was ambiguous, at best, and because appellants filed a motion for extension of time before the expiration of time for service of an answer it was error for the court not to set aside the clerk’s default. See Hader v. American Builders & Contractors Co., 564 So.2d 271, 271-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); see also Venero v. Balbuena, 652 So.2d 1271, 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

The judgment is reversed, the order on default quashed and this cause remanded to allow appellants to answer the complaint and for orderly proceedings thereafter.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Venero v. Balbuena
652 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hader v. American Builders & Contractors Co.
564 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 So. 2d 832, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8101, 1998 WL 375425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/varela-v-gregory-a-martin-associates-pa-fladistctapp-1998.