Vareka Investments, N.V. v. National Life Insurance Co.
This text of 469 So. 2d 931 (Vareka Investments, N.V. v. National Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The lease provision interpreted differently by the parties contains a latent ambiguity that may be resolved only by consideration of extrinsic evidence, which evidence is itself conflicting. Summary judgment is inappropriate notwithstanding that the case is to be tried before the same judge who may have considered the extrinsic evidence in entering summary judgment. See Morton v. Morton, 307 So.2d 835, 839-40 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 324 So.2d 90 (Fla.1975).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 So. 2d 931, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1327, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vareka-investments-nv-v-national-life-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1985.