Vardiman v. Booker, Jr

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedOctober 28, 2021
Docket4:17-cv-02358
StatusUnknown

This text of Vardiman v. Booker, Jr (Vardiman v. Booker, Jr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vardiman v. Booker, Jr, (E.D. Mo. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

NORVETT VARDIMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-CV-2358 RLW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court following the entry of default judgment against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr. On September 10, 2020, default judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff Norvett Vardiman and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count IV of the Complaint (Negligence); in favor of Plaintiff Ronnie Gooch and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count VIII of the Complaint (Negligence); in favor of Plaintiff Ania Warner and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count XII of the Complaint (Negligence); in favor of Plaintiff Michael Hudson and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count XVI of the Complaint (Negligence); in favor of Plaintiff Dennis Royal-Reed and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count XX of the Complaint (Negligence); and in favor of Plaintiff Charles Singleton and against Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., as to Count XXIV of the Complaint (Negligence). The Court entered Default Judgment against Defendant Booker as to liability but determined there was insufficient evidence to establish damages to a reasonable degree of certainty, and it set a hearing on damages for October 13, 2020. Everyday Learning Corp. v. Larson, 242 F.3d 815, 818-19 (8th Cir. 2001) (if the damages claim is indefinite or uncertain, the amount of damages must be proved to a reasonable degree of certainty). The hearing was reset and then cancelled due to issues related to COVID 19. Plaintiffs have since filed written Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to Damages, as well as additional exhibits. Defendant Booker failed to respond to Plaintiffs’ filings. After reviewing Plaintiffs’ filings in this case, the Court concludes a hearing on damages is unnecessary, and it will decide the issue of damages based on the written record. Holman v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union, 117 F.3d 1422, 1424 (8th Cir. 1997) (district court was not

required to hold an evidentiary hearing before assessing the amount of out-of-pocket medical expenses, where the uncontested amounts were “capable of ascertainment from definite figures in [witness] affidavit”). The Court makes the following findings regarding damages in this case. I. Discussion Plaintiffs have established that Defendant Booker is liable for negligence as a result the motor vehicle collision. On March 29, 2016, Plaintiffs Norvett Vardiman, Ronnie Gooch, Ania Warner, Michael Hudson, Dennis Royal-Reed, and Charles Singleton were traveling in a Chevrolet Avalanche on eastbound Interstate 70 in St. Louis, Missouri, when Defendant Aaron Booker, Jr., rear-ended Plaintiffs’ vehicle. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 1 at 4-5). The force of the rear-end collision

subsequently propelled Plaintiffs’ vehicle into the adjacent wall of the highway. (Id. at 2, 5). Plaintiffs each reported experiencing pain to their bodies, including their arms, legs, backs, and necks, as a result of the accident. (Id. at 5). A. Plaintiff Norvett Vardiman On March 29, 2016, after the collision, Plaintiff Norvett Vardiman sought treatment for her injuries at Christian Hospital Northwest where she was diagnosed with strain of lumbar paraspinal muscle. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 2 at 1-7). Plaintiff Vardiman subsequently sought treatment from chiropractor William Droege for her accident-related injuries. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 3 at 3-13, Ex. 7 at 12-19). Plaintiff Vardiman received regular treatment from Dr. Droege between April 5, 2016 and June 20, 2016. (Id.) Dr. Droege ordered an MRI of Plaintiff Vardiman’s lumbar spine which revealed disc protrusions at L1-L2, L4-L5, and L5-S1, as well as disc herniation at L2-L3. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 3 at 1-2). Ms. Vardiman was also referred to pain management specialist Dr. Naseem Shekhani, who noted symptoms of chest, neck, and back pain, as well as pain radiating to her bilateral shoulders,

buttocks, and thigh. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 4). Dr. Shekhani noted additional complaints that the pain experienced by Plaintiff Vardiman affected her appetite, sleep, socialization, and activities of daily living. (Id. at 5). Dr. Shekhani diagnosed Plaintiff Vardiman with cervicalgia with occipital headaches, bilateral shoulder injury, bilateral thigh pain, and lumbago with facet joint syndrome. (Id.). Dr. Shekhani treated Plaintiff Vardiman with facet joint injections, prescription therapy, performed a diagnostic right shoulder ultrasound, and ordered anti-inflammatories for her accident-related injuries between April 12, 2016 and October 12, 2016. (Id.). Plaintiff Vardiman was subsequently referred to orthopedic specialist Dr. Keith Wilkey, who evaluated Plaintiff Vardiman’s symptoms on May 17, 2016 and July 5, 2016, prescribed

medication, and ultimately referred Plaintiff Vardiman for a surgical evaluation due to her worsening symptoms. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 6). Plaintiff Vardiman was referred to orthopedic surgeon Dr. Armond Levy, who evaluated Plaintiff Vardiman for her accident-related symptoms, ordered an EBI Stimulator, prescribed medication, performed injections, and ultimately performed surgery in the form of a Right L4-5 minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 5 at 3-13, Ex. 2 at 8-19). Plaintiff Vardiman’s medical treatment resulted in medical expenses which totaled $189,571.07 prior to any reductions, payments, or other adjustments. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 7). BJC HealthCare billed Plaintiff Vardiman $770.00 for Dr. Adams’s services. The bill was adjusted, and BJC HealthCare accepted $172.18 as payment on Plaintiff Vardiman’s behalf. (ECF No. 48, Ex. 7 at 2). BJC HealthCare billed Plaintiff Vardiman $93,696.88 for Dr. Levy’s services. The bill was adjusted and $21,195.05 was paid on Plaintiff Vardiman’s behalf. (Id. at 7). BJC billed Plaintiff Vardiman $2,146.22 for Dr. Patel’s services. The bill was adjusted and $479.79 was paid

on Plaintiff Vardiman’s behalf. (Id. at 9). Northwest Healthcare billed Plaintiff Vardiman $671.00. The bill was adjusted and $41.52 was paid, leaving a balance of $10.59. (Id. at 11). Esquire Sport billed Plaintiff Vardiman $6,077.00 for Dr. Droege’s services. There is no evidence the bill was adjusted, or that payments have been made. (Id. at 19). Dr. Shekhani billed Plaintiff Vardiman $13,280.00. There is no evidence the bill was adjusted or that payments have been made. (Id. at 22). Opensided MRI of St. Louis billed $1695.00 for Dr. Diemer’s services. There is no evidence the bill was adjusted or paid. (Id. at 20). Key Heath Medical Solutions billed Plaintiff Vardiman $1,896.97 for Drs. Wilkey’s and Shekhani’s services. There is no evidence the bill was paid or adjusted. (Id. at 23). Orthopedic Associates billed Plaintiff Vardiman $587.00, which was not

adjusted or paid. (Id. at 24-25). St. Louis Neurosurgery billed Plaintiff Vardiman $63,600.00. There is no evidence this bill was adjusted or paid. (Id. at 26). Midwest Radiological Associates billed Plaintiff Vardiman $34.00, which was not adjusted or paid. (Id. at 30). And finally, there is an invoice for services by Dr. Levy for $5,890.00, which was not adjusted or paid. Under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 490.715, a plaintiff seeking special damages for medical expenses “may introduce evidence of the actual cost of the medical care or treatment rendered to a plaintiff or a patient whose care is at issue. Actual cost of the medical care or treatment shall be reasonable, necessary, and a proximate result of the negligence or fault of any party.” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 490.715.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Gonzalez v. United States
681 F.3d 949 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Davidson v. Schneider
349 S.W.2d 908 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1961)
Meier v. Schrock
405 S.W.3d 31 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vardiman v. Booker, Jr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vardiman-v-booker-jr-moed-2021.