Varad v. Barshak

First Circuit

Varad v. Barshak

93 F. App'x 255

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 30, 2004·No. 03-1779·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This pro se appellant, Christine Varad, appeals from a decision granting summary judgment for appellee, Edward Barshak, Varad v. Barshak, 261 F.Supp.2d 47 (D.Mass.2003). After careful review of the parties’ contentions in light of the record, we affirm the decision on the Title II claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132, substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion. The appellee apparently *256 concedes that the court’s rulings on Va-rad’s remaining claims were erroneous and argues that they should be rejected on the merits. We agree. As the court’s discussion of the facts indicates, 261 F.Supp.2d at 48-52, these claims were meritless.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This pro se appellant, Christine Varad, appeals from a decision granting summary judgment for appellee, Edward Barshak, Varad v. Barshak, 261 F.Supp.2d 47 (D.Mass.2003). After careful review of the parties’ contentions in light of the record, we affirm the decision on the Title II claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132, substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion. The appellee apparently *256 concedes that the court’s rulings on Va-rad’s remaining claims were erroneous and argues that they should be rejected on the merits. We agree. As the court’s discussion of the facts indicates, 261 F.Supp.2d at 48-52, these claims were meritless.

Affirmed.

Varad v. Barshak, 93 F. App'x 255 (1st Cir. 2004).

Pincite

93 F. App'x 255 (Varad v. Barshak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related