V.A.P., v.
This text of V.A.P., v. (V.A.P., v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
V.A.P., : No. 50 WM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : KATHRYN HENS-GRECO, NANCY : AQUINO, RAMONA TROY, RAETONE : MCKENZIE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Application for
Immediate Hearing are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of
the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
V.A.P., v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vap-v-pa-2018.