VanZelf v. Shaad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

VanZelf v. Shaad

148 A.D.2d 1013, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.D.2d 1013 (VanZelf v. Shaad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VanZelf v. Shaad, 148 A.D.2d 1013, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted and appellant is directed to perfect the appeal upon a full record or a more complete appen[1014]*1014dix containing the testimony necessary to consider the issues raised by respondent, including whether the findings are against the weight of the evidence. (See, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [c] [2].) Present^-Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted and appellant is directed to perfect the appeal upon a full record or a more complete appen[1014]*1014dix containing the testimony necessary to consider the issues raised by respondent, including whether the findings are against the weight of the evidence. (See, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [c] [2].) Present^-Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.D.2d 1013, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanzelf-v-shaad-nyappdiv-1989.