Vanzant v. Weissglass

692 F. App'x 728
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 6, 2017·No. No. 17-6032·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Joe Vanzant appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Vanzant’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action [729] claiming deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Vanzant v. Weissglass, No. 8:15-cv-02876-RBH, 2016 WL 4607595 (D.S.C., Sept. 6, 2016 & Dec. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vanzant v. Weissglass, 692 F. App'x 728 (4th Cir. 2017).

692 F. App'x 728 (Vanzant v. Weissglass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickerson v. Stirling
D. South Carolina, 2020