Vanzant v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2009
Docket08-2011
StatusUnpublished

This text of Vanzant v. Commissioner of Social Security (Vanzant v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanzant v. Commissioner of Social Security, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2011

ROBIN G. VANZANT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (2:07-cv-00069-pms)

Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 6, 2009

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Julia C. Dudley, Acting United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Eric P. Kressman, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, Patricia M. Smith, Supervising Attorney, Tara A. Czekaj, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robin G. Vanzant appeals the magistrate judge’s order

denying her motion for summary judgment, granting the

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and affirming the

Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for Disability

Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act. * We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.

Vanzant v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 2:07-cv-00069-pms (W.D. Va.

Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties’ consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vanzant v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanzant-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2009.