Vanyo v. Salisbury

23 A.D.2d 804, 258 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4557

This text of 23 A.D.2d 804 (Vanyo v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanyo v. Salisbury, 23 A.D.2d 804, 258 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Williams, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the finding that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence was against the weight of evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veechio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 804, 258 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanyo-v-salisbury-nyappdiv-1965.