Vanvlerah v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vanvlerah v. State

489 S.W.3d 815, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2015 WL 967329

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. ED 101102·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tessa Lynn Vanvlerah appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tessa Lynn Vanvlerah appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Vanvlerah v. State, 489 S.W.3d 815, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 2015 WL 967329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 815 (Vanvlerah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.