Vanvaks v. Chantly

145 So. 838, 107 Fla. 647
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 145 So. 838 (Vanvaks v. Chantly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vanvaks v. Chantly, 145 So. 838, 107 Fla. 647 (Fla. 1933).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the. same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Palmer
245 So. 2d 860 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Brown v. Palmer
233 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Miami Transit Company v. Yellen
22 So. 2d 787 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Mallory v. Edgar
175 So. 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer
171 So. 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRoberts
149 So. 631 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 838, 107 Fla. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanvaks-v-chantly-fla-1933.