Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc.
541 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 791, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1590, 1989 WL 27927
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1989·No. Nos. 87-3039, 88-0495·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm, concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for continuance, nor did it err in awarding plaintiff Miami Purveyors an attorney’s fee based on the legend, providing for same, upon the invoices which accompanied the deliveries and which were signed by some employee of the receiving restaurant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc., 541 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 791, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1590, 1989 WL 27927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
541 So. 2d 704 (Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sun Power Diesel, Inc. v. Florida Detroit Diesel-Allison, Inc.
701 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)