Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc.
541 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 791, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1590, 1989 WL 27927
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 29, 1989
DocketNos. 87-3039, 88-0495
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 541 So. 2d 704 (Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc., 541 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 791, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1590, 1989 WL 27927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
We affirm, concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for continuance, nor did it err in awarding plaintiff Miami Purveyors an attorney’s fee based on the legend, providing for same, upon the invoices which accompanied the deliveries and which were signed by some employee of the receiving restaurant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sun Power Diesel, Inc. v. Florida Detroit Diesel-Allison, Inc.
701 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
541 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 791, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1590, 1989 WL 27927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanuchi-v-miami-purveyors-inc-fladistctapp-1989.