Vantrel Enterprisers, Inc. v. Vantage Petroleum Corp.
This text of 270 A.D.2d 412 (Vantrel Enterprisers, Inc. v. Vantage Petroleum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover payment for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered December 21, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly found that the plaintiff corporation does not have standing to maintain the present action since it was dissolved, inter alia, for neglecting to pay requisite franchise taxes, penalties, and interest charges (see, Tax Law § 203-a [7]) and has not been reinstated (see, Lorisa Capital Corp. v Gallo, 119 AD2d 99; De George v Yusko, 169 AD2d 865; cf., In re McGregor, 182 Bankr 96 [US Bankruptcy Ct, SD NY, May 5, 1995, Garrity, J.]).
In light of this determination, we need not reach the remaining issues. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 412, 704 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vantrel-enterprisers-inc-v-vantage-petroleum-corp-nyappdiv-2000.