Vantine v. United States

168 F. 562, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5404
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 16, 1909·No. No. 5,192·Published

Opinion

FACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The articles imported are hand-painted panels, to be hung on a wall or other appropriate place. To each one there is affixed a small calendar, manifestly a trifling part of the entire article. They seem to be within the principle laid down in Tiffany v. United States (C. C.) 66 Fed. 736, and should be classified under Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, par. 454, 30 Stat. 194 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1678).

Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vantine v. United States, 168 F. 562, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5404 (circtsdny 1909).

168 F. 562 (Vantine v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tiffany v. United States
66 F. 736 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1895)