Vanselous v. McClellan
This text of 1913 OK 126 (Vanselous v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 24,1907, defendant in error, John E. McClellan, sued Thomas Vanselous and James Ham *506 ilton, plaintiffs in error, in the district court oí Kay county, in ejectment for certain lots described in his petition. There was trial and judgment for plaintiff, and when a second trial which was granted resulted the same way, defendants bring the case here. But we cannot pass upon the merits of this cause, but must dismiss it. This for the reason that, owing to a failure of plaintiffs in error to comply with rule 25 (.20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) of this court and set forth in their brief a specification of errors complained of, we can only conjecture what is relied upon to reverse the case. Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1913 OK 126, 131 P. 172, 35 Okla. 505, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanselous-v-mcclellan-okla-1913.