Vann v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Vann v. Youngblood

191 S.E. 100, 184 Ga. 281, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 499

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1937·No. No. 11703·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beok, Presiding Justice.

1. There being no assignment of error on the direction of the verdict, this court has no authority to decide whether the court erred in so directing. Kelley v. Cartledge, 151 Ga. 179 (106 S. E. 93); Stone v. Hebard Lumber Co., 145 Ga. 729 (89 S. E. 814).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. G. W. Foy, for plaintiff in error. T. B. Rainey, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beok, Presiding Justice.

1. There being no assignment of error on the direction of the verdict, this court has no authority to decide whether the court erred in so directing. Kelley v. Cartledge, 151 Ga. 179 (106 S. E. 93); Stone v. Hebard Lumber Co., 145 Ga. 729 (89 S. E. 814).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. G. W. Foy, for plaintiff in error. T. B. Rainey, contra.

Vann v. Youngblood, 191 S.E. 100, 184 Ga. 281, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 499 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

191 S.E. 100 (Vann v. Youngblood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Related