Vann v. . Winders

113 S.E. 927, 184 N.C. 629, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 148

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: October 11, 1922
• Status: Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This was a proceeding under C. S., 740, in which the judgment debtor, defendant herein, being dissatisfied with the valuation and allotment of his homestead and personal property exemptions, as assessed by the appraisers in an execution, undertook to have the same set aside and vacated for alleged irregularities in the returns.

It is stated in the record that “after a hearing, the defendant’s exceptions were overruled, defendant excepted and appealed,” but there was no order or judgment signed by the judge; at least, none appears on the record. The record seems to be incomplete. Logan v. Harris, 90 N. C., 7. However, we have examined the defendant’s exceptions and find them to be without merit. No error has been shown.

Affirmed.