Vann v. State

1921 OK CR 63, 197 P. 182, 18 Okla. Crim. 584, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 25, 1921
DocketNo. A-3538.
StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 63 (Vann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vann v. State, 1921 OK CR 63, 197 P. 182, 18 Okla. Crim. 584, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, Ed Vann, herein referred to as the defendant, was by information charged with the crime of murder, committed by shooting Augustus Joseph in Creek county,- on or about the 19th day of June, 1918. He was duly arraigned, and upon a plea of not guilty he was tried, convicted of murder, and his punishment assessed at imprisonment for life in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict he appeals.

No brief has been filed, and we have not been favored with an oral argument in behalf of the defendant. The grounds of the motion for a new trial, and assigned as error in the petition, question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

A substantial statement of the testimony of each witness who testified in the case is as follows:

Andrew Ferguson testified:

“I live in Creek county near Edna, within hallooing distance from the house of Augustus Joseph. The old man lived in a log house. His son lived with him, also a granddaughter. At the time of the homicide the defendant, Ed Vann, was staying there. The evening old man Joseph *586 was killed I was on my. way to church, and I noticed that the old house where old man .Joseph kept his mules was on fire. I went to the tent, where his boy generally stayed, and no one was there, so I called to the house, and no one answered. Then I went down to the old house and looked in. Old man Joseph was lying on the floor dead. The house overhead was burning. ’ I called, whooped, and hallooed, and no one answered. Then I head a noise like horses running behind the old house to the north, and I called again, ,and did’nt get any answer, so I went to the church about one-half mile north, and notified the people, and five came back to the fire with me. We found Clem Dixon and the defendant there. They had taken the body out/ of the house. Then we phoned to Reggs for the officers,' and they came, and we questioned the defendant, and hd -.said that he went for the mules that evening, and left two oil men at the house in close conversation with the old man. He said one of the men had on a blue serge suit and a straw hat, and his clothes seemed to be dirty with oil, and the other man had a blue overall suit on and a cap. We found a shotgun shell lying near 'the house, and asked the defendant where it came from. He said early that morning he shot a chicken for breakfast. The shell and the wadding seemed to be perfectly dry, and it had rained off and on that day until about 4 o’clock. There was seven or eight bales of hay upstairs in the old stable. I was present when the officers searched old man Joseph’s house. They found a double-barrel shotgun and a Winchester rifle, Old man Joseph had been shot in the neck with a shotgun. The only stock the old man had was a pair of mules.”

Clem Dixon testified:

“I live north of old man Joseph’s house, about half a mile, near the church. That day between sundown and dark the defendant passed my place, going west in a wagon. He was riding with my brother-in-law, coming from church. About an hour later I was at Gus Hallibut’s, not quite half a mile north from where old man Joseph lived. The defend *587 ant, riding a mule and leading another, came up and said, ‘I believe our house is afire.’ We got up and went out to where he was. He said, ‘Get on one of the mules and ride. I got on one of the mules and we rode as hard as we could go, and down about the field he said, ‘There is nothing but that old house burning.’ We went on, and when we got there I started towards the fire. He said, ‘There ain’t nothing out there to hurt about.’ I heard some chickens, and I said, ‘There áre some chickens in there.’ I went and looked in the old house. The fire was overhead, and I saw old man Joseph lying there. I called him, but he did not answer, so I grabbed hold of him to pull him out. He was so heavy I didn’t pull him the first pull, so the defendant helped me pull him gat of, the house. I looked around, the ,old man’s hat was lying out near the house they lived in, I said, ‘I believe this old man was shot, and somebody dragged him in this old house, aiming to burn him up.’ He said, ‘Yes; that is about it.’ So I began to halloo. He said, ‘You reckon if we would shoot they would come any faster?’ I said. ‘Yes; I believe they.would.’' He went into the house and got a Winchester, and comes out the door and shoots straight up. Then it was not long before people began to gather.”

Aban Scott testified:

“I live 10 miles southwest of -Beggs. Old man .Joseph lived about half a mile southwest of me on the same place. The defendant passed my place in a wagon with Clem Dixon’s people before sundown the night old man Joseph was killed. He hallooed to me, and asked me for my wagon. That night after “services had started at the church he came back, riding a mule. He said: T stayed a long time, didn’t I? Do you reckon I will get to church in time for services?’ I said, T reckon it will be over by the time you get there.’ He said, T would have made it back sooner, but I had to go into the bottom to look for these mules; where do you reckon I found them?’ I said, ‘Where?’ He said, T found them in the school yard; furthermore, I guess you know *588 one thing — Mr. Joseph sure had a lots of company at home.’ My little children asked him who were there, men or women. He said,‘Men,’ and they said, ‘Who were the men?’ He said, ’Oil. men.’ Well, he rode on a little piece further, and said, ‘Look here; I see a light down there in your field.’ I said, ‘I guess it is an automobile light.’ He said, ‘You come her«; it is somebody’s house; come and look.’ Well, we looked, and he said, ‘Don’t you believe that is somebody’s house?’ The children said, ‘Ed, do you suppose that is your old house?’ He said, T will go on back.’ I said, ‘there is harness there in that barn?’ He said, ‘Oh, no; I will go back; I wonder where poor old man Joseph is at.’ He went back, hallooing fire, towards Gus Hallibut’s house. I went on behind him, and when I got there they had the old man out. The fire was on his clothes; his pants were, burned; there was a gunshot wound in his neck, and some shot in his jaw. I said to the defendant, ‘Ed,'bring that lantern here.’ He said, T can’t stand that,’ and I said, ‘What kind of a’ hole do you think that js. on this old man ?’ He said, ‘A bullet.’ I said, ‘No; this was a shotgun.’ We all stepped back, and I said, ‘Ed, where were the men you saw?’ He said, ‘Right where the old man sat, on this .box.’ I said, ‘If you were to see these two men again, would you know them?’ He said, T don’t know; they would go off and disfigure themselves,’ I said, ‘Something is got to be' done about this.’ He said, ‘They are gone, long gone. One had a blue overall suit on and a' cap, and the other had a navy blue suit and a straw hat on.’ I said, ‘Well, do you suppose they are down in the bottom?’ He s¡aid, ‘They, are done gone.’ I said, ‘Did they have any gun?’ He said, T didn’t see any gun; if I would say they1 hdd a gun I would tell a lie.’ I said, ‘Maybe they got his gun and shot him.’ He said, ‘No; there wasn’t but one shell on the place, and I killed a chicken with it this morning.’ I examined the tracks; there were two mule tracks straight across the field from old man Joseph’s house to my house.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1921 OK CR 63, 197 P. 182, 18 Okla. Crim. 584, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vann-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.