Vann v. State

99 So. 3d 633, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2012 WL 5350152
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2012·No. No. 1D11-5978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for removal of the sexual offender registration requirement. In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was “not more than 4 years older than the victim” pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Consistent with the prior decisions of our sister courts construing the plain language of the statute, we conclude the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion because appellant was four years, three months, and ten days older than the victim. See State v. Welch, 94 So.3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); State v. Samuels, 76 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Marcel, 67 So.3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vann v. State, 99 So. 3d 633, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2012 WL 5350152 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

99 So. 3d 633 (Vann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Caragol
120 So. 3d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)