Vann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vann v. State

99 So. 3d 633, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2012 WL 5350152

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-5978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 So. 3d 633 (Vann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vann v. State, 99 So. 3d 633, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2012 WL 5350152 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for removal of the sexual offender registration requirement. In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was “not more than 4 years older than the victim” pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Consistent with the prior decisions of our sister courts construing the plain language of the statute, we conclude the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion because appellant was four years, three months, and ten days older than the victim. See State v. Welch, 94 So.3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); State v. Samuels, 76 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Marcel, 67 So.3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion for removal of the sexual offender registration requirement. In order to qualify for removal of the registration requirement, appellant had to establish he was “not more than 4 years older than the victim” pursuant to section 943.04354(l)(c), Florida Statutes. Consistent with the prior decisions of our sister courts construing the plain language of the statute, we conclude the trial court properly denied appellant’s motion because appellant was four years, three months, and ten days older than the victim. See State v. Welch, 94 So.3d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); State v. Samuels, 76 So.3d 1109 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Marcel, 67 So.3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 3d 633, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955, 2012 WL 5350152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vann-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack