Vann v. State
801 So. 2d 326, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18521, 2001 WL 1661634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2001·No. No. 1D01-2826·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
As the state correctly concedes, the trial court erred in 'imposing a departure sentence based on factors underlying the revocation of appellant’s probation. See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); see also Routenberg v. State, 677 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence imposed upon revocation of probation and remand for resen-tencing within the guidelines. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vann v. State, 801 So. 2d 326, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18521, 2001 WL 1661634 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
801 So. 2d 326 (Vann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bush v. State
929 So. 2d 685 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)