Vann v. Russell

439 S.W.3d 852, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2014 WL 4290772
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 2, 2014
DocketNo. ED 101838
StatusPublished

This text of 439 S.W.3d 852 (Vann v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vann v. Russell, 439 S.W.3d 852, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2014 WL 4290772 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant filed a petition for habeas corpus with the trial court, which denied his petition. Appellant filed an appeal from this judgment and has raised two points in his brief assigning error to the denial of his habeas petition. However, the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus is not appealable. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458, 458 (Mo. banc 2003); Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App.E.D.2003).

The State’s motion to dismiss is granted. The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.

LISA VAN AMBURG, J. and PHILIP M. HESS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webster v. Purkett
110 S.W.3d 832 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)
Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
97 S.W.3d 458 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 S.W.3d 852, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 948, 2014 WL 4290772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vann-v-russell-moctapp-2014.