Vann v. Magana
This text of 52 F. App'x 412 (Vann v. Magana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Robert A. Vann, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging the defendant violated, inter alia, his Eighth Amendment rights by ordering him to leave the library restroom before he had finished using it. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Weeks v. Bayer, 246 F.3d 1231, 1234 (9th Cir.2001). and we affirm.
The district court properly granted defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings without providing Vann an opportunity to cure the deficiencies in his complaint because the complaint lacked merit entirely. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vann-v-magana-ca9-2002.