Vanmeter v. Durham

Illinois Supreme Court

Vanmeter v. Durham

31 Ill. 237

DecidedApril 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ill. 237 (Vanmeter v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vanmeter v. Durham, 31 Ill. 237 (Ill. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice CatoN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the return of service of which complaint is made : “ The within named Daniel P. Yanmeter waived reading, and accepted service, this 29th day of March, 1862. James W. Buegess, Sheriff.” In Maher v. Bull, 26 Ill. 348, we decided that' such a service as this, is insufficient, and hence it is unnecessary to multiply words on the subject. Our reasons for this opinion are there given.

The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice CatoN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the return of service of which complaint is made : “ The within named Daniel P. Yanmeter waived reading, and accepted service, this 29th day of March, 1862. James W. Buegess, Sheriff.” In Maher v. Bull, 26 Ill. 348, we decided that' such a service as this, is insufficient, and hence it is unnecessary to multiply words on the subject. Our reasons for this opinion are there given.

The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ill. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vanmeter-v-durham-ill-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack